Where Ted Stroll got it wrong in STC’s Objection to the Bitterroot Travel Plan.

Recently, Ted Stroll and the Sustainable Trails Coalition published a bloated 9 pages of gobbly gook, which is their Objection to the Bitterroot Travel Plan. The Objection is full of misinformation and false statements. The Objection Letter is located here: STC's Bitteroot Objection. I don't have the time and will power to write about all of them but here are a few of them

Relying too much on the Wilderness Act
In the Response, Ted comically writes that the Forest Service relies too much on the Wilderness Act when making their decision. Here it is:

excerpt from STC's Objection to the Bitterroot Travel Plan

Instead, Ted concludes that the Forest Service should be following the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977. But there’s only one problem with that. The actual MWSA of 1977 says that the Wilderness Study Areas created by the Act must “be administered by the Secretary of the Agriculture so as to maintain the presently existing wilderness character and potential for inclusion in the Wilderness Preservation System.” In other words, those Wilderness Study Areas must be managed just like a Wilderness Area until Congress decides on them. The Wilderness Act clearly states “no other form of mechanical transport.”. All agencies that manage Wilderness Areas (National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and even the Forest Service) agree that mountain bikes are banned from Wilderness Areas. Therefore allowing mountain bikes in the WSA’s created by the Montana Wilderness Study Area Act of 1977 would not be maintaining the “Wilderness Character” of those Areas.

Excerpt from the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977

Also, letting mountain bikers continue to ride in these WSAs will make them become more attached to these areas. They will become more opposed to the creation of those Wilderness Areas. This is not maintaining the “potential for inclusion in the Wilderness Preservation System"

And one last thing, Ted and STC seems to think there is an additional category that bikes are placed into. They write: "The Record of decision relies on the the Wilderness Act in placing mountain biking in a separate category, ie, a middle ground that is neither motorized or unaided by mechanical assistance.”   Again, the Wilderness Act does no such thing. There are only two categories. They are items that are considered mechanical transport and items that are not.

Abandonment of Trails.
In the follow passage Ted laments on the Forest Service abandonment of trails.

Excerpt from STC Objection to the Bitterroot Travel Plan

Some of the stuff in that passage is an outright lie. He lists three things as the main causes. In the first reason he writes blames the Forest Service’s refusal to use chainsaws and wheelbarrows and chainsaws “even though the Wilderness Act of 1964 allows for the use of this equipment.” Well, Ted, the Wilderness Act clearly says “no use of motorized equipment” and “no other form of mechanical transport.”

 After the 1999 Derecho the Forest Service use chainsaws to assist the evacuation of people in the interior.

Clearly, chainsaws are motorized equipment and wheelbarrows are mechanical transport. Yes, chainsaws can be used in an emergency situation. Such was the case when a giant windstorm hit the Boundary Waters and people were trapped in the interior regions. But just having some overgrown trails is not an emergency situation. Also, the rules for the Wilderness allow for small handheld devices such as electric shavers and transistor radios. You have to remember that back in 1964 transistor radios were small and not very loud. People used them just to get the weather report.

Cross Cut Saws are used in Wilderness Areas

Chainsaws that can be heard from a mile away are not small hand held devices. Instead, Cross Cut Saws must be used in Wilderness Areas.  They do a good job but are a workout.

On his second reason, I actually agree with Ted. The Forest Service’s Budget and personnel have been strained because of fighting forest fires. That’s why Forest Rangers don’t need the added responsibility and headaches involved in deciding which trails in Wilderness Areas should have mountain bikes. Wilderness Areas are less than 2.7% of the land area in the lower 48 States, and even Ted Stroll has said it will never be over 3%. There just isn't enough pristine land left in the lower 48 States to make much more Wilderness.

Mountain bikers have plenty of places to ride in the vicinity of Blue Joint and Sapphire.

 And mountain bikers themselves are less than 3% of the population. Mountain bikers have never shown any data to suggest they don’t have enough places to ride. We should just leave the Wilderness Areas for their intended purposes: for the preservation of the land and as a wildlife sanctuary.
 

A North Country Trail Work Crew looking clean before heading out to work on the Trail.

And his 3rd reason Ted harps about the inadequate use of volunteers. He says that mountain bikers are “famous for our prodigious and unmatched trail-maintenance effort. “ Everybody should now take a bow to mountain bikers who are god’s gift to trail maintenance. Never mind that the Appalachian Trail, North Country Trail, Ice Age Trail and a host of other trails are maintained solely by hikers, and the Pacific Crest Trail is maintained by hikers and horseback riders. 

Again, mountain bikers are less than 3% of the population and the mountain bikers who maintain trails are a fraction of that. Basically what’s going to happen is if mountain bikers start maintaining Wilderness Trails, well, they are not going to be able to maintain all the trails they already have outside of the Wilderness. Some towns have spent a lot of time, money and hard work creating wonderful mountain biking trail systems. It would be a shame if those systems fall into disrepair because mountain biking trail maintainers are going elsewhere.

Because mountain bikers go faster, they need longer sight lines than hikers.

And here are some more thoughts on Trail Maintenance in Wilderness Areas. Many times mountain bikers claim that trails in Wilderness Areas are not cleared properly. Well, trails in Wilderness Areas are cleared to a “minimum standard.” Mountain bikers need the trail cleared more than the minimum standard because mountain bikers are going faster and need longer sight lines. Also, if Ted Stroll and STC are so concerned about Trail Maintenance, why don’t they sponsor some trail clearing trips. So far to my knowledge, STC has not done one iota of trail work.

Unconstitutional and a Violation of the First Amendment. 

In the last few pages of STC’s objection letter they claim that the Forest Service violated the First Amendment and is unconstitutional. The whole problem with that STC is ignoring is that the Travel Plan really doesn’t affect the Sapphire and Blue Joint Wilderness Study Areas. The rules for those two areas were set by the Montana Wilderness Study Area Act of 1977, and the comment period for those rules happened back then.

Ted Stroll testifies for a the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Sustainable Trails Coalition not suing the Forest Service. Ted Stroll and STC wrote 9 pages of gobbly gook for the Bitteroot Travel Plan Objection. Ted Stroll traveled to Washington DC last year to testify before Congress. But Ted and STC are still unwilling to sue the Forest Service to get mountain bikes into Wilderness Areas. With all the time and effort they've been spending on this, they could have sued the Forest Service ten times. The reason they won’t sue the Forest Service is they know full well they would lose. The Wilderness Act clearly says “no other form of mechanical transport,” and that bans bicycles in Wilderness Area, period.

The Wilderness Areas that are known as Boulders/White Cloud

What needs to happen
Simply put Congress needs to decide on these Wilderness Study Areas.  That's what happened in 2015 when Congress approved the Boulders/White Clouds Wilderness Areas in Idaho.  At that time Congress released 155,000 acres of land from Wilderness Study Area status which can potentially become multi-use.  Of course, I am hoping the decision of Congress will be to approve Sapphire and Blue Joint as Wilderness Areas.  These national treasures deserve the Wilderness designation

Ted Stroll tells another Maah Daah Hey Trail Lie.

You'd think Ted Stroll would shy away from writing about the Maah Daah Hey Trail after in a previous blog, I showed everyone that he didn't know what he was talking about.  That blog is located here: http://preservingthepct.blogspot.com/2017/10/ted-stroll-tells-another-little-fib.html

That blog post shows that Ted Stroll provided the incorrect information and exaggerated about the MDHT in an interview with the Frontlines Podcast.  But now, Ted doubles down on his lies, in of all places his testimony to the US House of Representatives Federal Lands Subcommittee

Ted writes

Ted laments that you cannot carry your bikes on the Wilderness part of the trail, then he seems to indicate that if you ride your bike using Theodore Roosevelt National Park roads, it is very dangerous.  He says that "cyclist have to truncate their once-in-a-lifetime adventure and risk their safety in the bargain..."

Ted seems to think that you need to use these dangerous roads to detour around the Wilderness.  This is totally not the case.  Ted is taking text from two different things and putting them together.

I have taken a screenshot of from the Maah Daah Hey Trail Website map.  I added green shading to show the area of the Northern Unit of the Theodore Roosevelt National Park.  Using a thick black line, I show the route of the detour that is described on the Maah Daah Hey Trail Association Website.

You can see clearly that the detour around the Wilderness Area IS NOT using the dangerous roads that the National Park Service described within the park.  In fact, the whole detour is outside of the park.  The detour goes down a lonely gravel road for 5 miles, then goes on a paved State Highway for one mile, then goes done another lonely gravel road for another 5 miles.

Again, clearly Ted Stroll got it wrong.

And he keeps getting it wrong.

Ted writes

In this paragraph is gleaming that the Park Superintendent (local land manager) should have the power to allow mountain biking in the Theodore Roosevelt Wilderness if she wants to. But will she want to?

Ted goes on to write that a local observer has reported the segment in the Northern Unit of the Park hasn't been maintained for over 4 years.   Sounds like Ted is BASHING the local land manager for not having the trail cleared.  I'm sure the Park Superintendent is SUPER THRILLED this is being reported to Congress.

Jackalopes are rarely seen in the Wild

Some Unnamed Mythical Local Observer reports the trail has not been maintain for 4 years, and Ted is using it in his testimony to Congress.  How bad is that?  Who is this Unnamed Mythical Observer.  Perhaps it is the same person who saw a Jackalope in the Wilderness part of the park.

For one thing, that local observer may not know that Trails in Wilderness Areas must be minimally maintained.  Maintainers cannot mow the trail because motorized equipment is not allowed in Wilderness Areas.  All of that may have lead the local observer to believe the trail in the Wilderness Area had not been maintained.

Ted Stroll just gave a black eye to the very Park Superintendent that he hopes will allow mountain bikes in that Wilderness Area if HR1347 is passed by Congress.  Good luck with that.

No wonder the International Mountain Biking Association has dropped its support of the Sustainable Trails Coalition Bill.  IMBA has worked hard to make great relationships with land managers, and here comes STC bashing those same land managers.

Like I've said before, all STC is doing is hurting the sport of mountain biking. 


Ted's written testimony to the Federal Lands Subcommittee
https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/testimony_stroll.pdf

IMBA's Testimony not supporting the STC Bill is located here:
https://www.imba.com/sites/default/files/HR1349_IMBA-Testimony_12-6-17.pdf

 

5 Places Where Ted Stroll's Testimony to Congress is wrong.

On Thursday, December 7, 2017, the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Federal Lands had a hearing about HR1349, the Bill that will allow mountain bikes in Wilderness Areas.  Ted Stroll of the Sustainable Trails Coalition submitted a written testimony in advance of this hearing.  At this time I am going to point out a few thing where Ted's testimony is wrong.  Places where he is misleading, exaggerating, or just plain making up stuff.  There is a link to Ted's Testimony at the end of this post. And just to be clear, this is responding to Ted's and STC's written testimony that he submitted before the hearing.  There are more things wrong with his actual testimony before the committee

Here's the first thing

Mechanized Conveyances
Ted writes: 

Really, the Act was meant to forbid people from using stuff like wagons and ski lifts, but somehow doesn't also cover mountain bikes.  A wagon is basically a metal structure connected to some wheels, but wait a minute, so are mountain bikes.  Take a look at this quote from Congressman Compton White Jr at the hearings for the Wilderness Act in 1964

Representative White seems to think according to the Act, Wilderness Areas should only be accessed by foot or horseback.  Sounds like Congress did mean to forbid everything except people on foot or horseback.

Purity Doctrine
Ted Writes:

Did you notice in the quote it said  "...permissible in wilderness areas..."  Well, Ted, Why don't you provide the whole quotes without the "..." in it.  What are you hiding.  Well, for one thing, the whole paragraph is about something different.  Morris Udall and Frank Church were complaining that the Forest Service was being too picky on what lands would be Wilderness.  This had nothing to do with bikes or any transportation in Wilderness Areas.


Forest Ranger
Then Ted goes on to write a story about a Forest Ranger

Which Mythical Forest Ranger was that?  Perhaps it the same one that saved Bugs Bunny from being shot by Elmer Fudd.  There are very few Wilderness Areas that most people would want to take their infant child into with a stroller.  And if they really wanted to take there baby there, all they need is a baby backpack.  Not having strollers in Wilderness Areas is not the end of the world for parents with babies.   But anyway, it was an entertaining story, Ted.  Next time when you quote a Forest Ranger, try to get her name.

Gila Wilderness
Ted writes about a story that a backpacker wrote in "The Taos News"

Well, that's nice, now let's see the real article.

You can clearly see that the article says "Deeper snow might have caused us to alter our course this time around, too"  There's a link to the article at the bottom of the blog.  And if you actually read the article it explains that the backpackers did the trip between March 14 and 18.  That's before the typical trail maintainer is out clearing the trail in the Spring.  No wonder the backpackers had overgrown trails. They had a winter's worth of downed trees on the trail that had not been cleared yet.

And here's another thing to add about the subject of clearing trails.  The Sustainable Trails Coalition keeps complaining about the conditions of trails within Wilderness Areas.  But, as far as I know, STC has NEVER sponsored a trail clearing trip, inside or outside of a Wilderness Area.

Singletracks Poll
Ted writes

Again, Ted refers to the Singletrack Poll that has proven to be faulty.  There's a link to that poll below.  And here's a screen shot of some of the comments from that article.

As you can clearly see, Singletracks did not define what Wilderness is.  Some people may think the woods on the edge of their town is wilderness.  So, should they be able to ride in the woods at the edge of town, sure.  And for most people the woods at the edge of town is a totally different thing than a Federally Designated Wilderness Area.

Ted Stroll knows that the Singletracks Survey is flawed, yet he continues to mention it.


Well, There are some more things that are wrong, but that's all the time I have for now, Seeya, Tman


Ted's Testimony
https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/testimony_stroll.pdf

Gila Wilderness Backpacking Story in the Taos News.
http://www.taosnews.com/stories/gila-wilderness-a-tough-but-rewarding-hike,7387

Singletracks Poll about Bikes in the Wilderness
https://www.singletracks.com/blog/trail-advocacy/96-of-mountain-bikers-think-wilderness-should-be-opened-to-bikes/

Ted Stroll Tells Another Little Fib

For quite some time I have been following Ted Stroll and his efforts to get mountain bikes on National Scenic Trails and in Wilderness Areas.  And every time Ted or the Sustainable Trails Coalition makes a claim, I have been checking them out.  And after researching the claims, almost all the time I find out that Ted is exaggerating, misrepresenting or outright fabricating the claim. Check out my other blog on this subject, “The Sustainable Trails Coalition: Just Making Up Stuff”

Screen shot of the Frontlines Podcast webpage

Ted continues his streak of misleading claims in a recent interview on the Frontlines Podcast with Brent Hillier.  In the interview Ted talks about the Maah Daah Hey Trail in North Dakota.  You can listen to the podcast here: http://frontlinesmtb.com/2017/10/27/ep-26-bikes-in-wilderness-part-3-interview-with-ted-stroll-of-the-sustainable-trails-coalition/

Here’s what Ted said

“The Maah Daah Hey is cut off for mountain biking at the north and south extremes because those areas are wilderness. And in the northern cut off, the wilderness is something like, I can’t remember, it’s a half-mile long, or something like that, but to get around it, you're not even allowed to walk your bicycle in a Wilderness Area under Federal Regulations, people have to drive their car 20 or 30 miles out of their way on these gravel roads to avoid this half mile stretch. It is just a crazy situation.”

So, let’s fact check Ted’s statement.  Ted says the Maah Daah Hey Trail goes through the Wilderness for “a half-mile long, or something like that.”  Take a look at the map I have provided from the National Park Service.  It clearly says the section through the Wilderness is 1.8 miles long.  I could see if the section in the wilderness was .7 or .8 miles long, that would be "something like a half mile long," but this is 1.8 miles.  It’s closer to 2 miles than it is 1/2 mile.

Then Ted says

“People have to drive their car 20 or 30 miles out of their way on these gravel roads to avoid this half mile stretch.”  Here is a quote on about the alternative route which is on the Maah Daah Hey Trail Association website: “Some riders will by-pass the Park exiting the MDHT on to Forest Service Road 825 near the intersection of the Long-X Trail traveling south and east 5 miles to US Highway 85, then south 1 mile to Forest Service Road 824, then 5 miles west to Bennett Trailhead.”

 

Screen Shot from the Maah Daah Hey Trail Association Website

Let’s see, you go 5 miles on FS825, then a mile on Hwy 85, then 5 miles on FS824 to the Bennett Trailhead.  That sounds like only 11 miles to me, not 20 or 30 miles.

If you take that 11 mile bypass, you would missing out on 12 miles of Maah Daah Hey Trail, which is a shame. But it’s not nearly as bad as Ted Stroll is making it out to be.  The Maah Daah Hey website even says “Some riders will just avoid the Park by starting from Bennett Trailhead.” In fact, there are only five miles of the Maah Daah Hey Trail north of the bypass. 

The Maah Daah Hey Trail Association website goes on to say about the northern unit  “MDHTA has worked for a number of years to acquire an easement for a by-pass trail but without success.”

MTB Project Rates the Buffalo Gap Trail as a 5 star Mountain Biking Trail

And in the southern Theodore Roosevelt National Park Unit, all you have to do is take the Buffalo Gap Trail to bypass the Wilderness.  The Buffalo Gap Trail Trail is rated a 5 star mountain biking trail by MTB Project.  It is actually 7 miles longer than taking the Maah Daah Hey Trail through the southern unit.  So, mountain bikers will be encountering many miles of wonderful trail which will not have very many hikers on it, because the hikers will be taking the Trail through the park.

Also, you may have noticed that Ted Stoll made another pitch on the Frontlines Podcast for people to send money to the Sustainable Trails Coalition.  Given all the fibs Ted Stroll has been telling, I’d say a better use of the money would be donating to the Maah Daah Hey Trail Association so they can purchase an easement around the Wilderness Area in the Northern Unit.

IMBA blatantly gives the wrong information to the Forest Service

Incorrectly Quotes Participation Study
In a letter to the Alleghany National Forest in support of mountain biking at Tracy Ridge, IMBA gives the Forest Service totally incorrect information.  The whole letter can be viewed here: http://tmanshikes.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tracy-Ridge-Shared-Use-Trails-EA-Comments-Google-Docs2.pdf 

The letter written by Anthony Duncan, Altantic Region Director of IMBA says the following:

Screen shot from IMBA Letter to the Forest Service

 Let’s take a look at page 11 of the 2016 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report.

As you can clearly see,  “Road Biking, Mountain Biking and BMX” COMBINED is the Third Most Popular Activity by Participation Rate and Second in Frequency.

Anthony Duncan clearly writes that mountain biking has those statistics, which is not even close.  He also writes that mountain biking has shown an increase in participation over the most recent three year period, which is also completely wrong.  When you take a look at the individual sport breakdown on page 34 of the report, you find a different story.

It clearly says that mountain biking participation was at 2.9% in 2013, and 2.8% in 2014 and 2015, which were the last three years covered by the study.  And as you can see from the breakout, even backpacking, which is listed two rows above mountain biking, has better numbers than mountain biking.  That's right, people would rather lug a backpack into the woods than go mountain biking.

Impacts to Wildlife

In the “Impacts to Wildlife” section of the letter, it mentions a study by Audrey Taylor and Richard L Knight is favorable to mountain biking.  It says the study notes “a general lack of difference between wildlife responses to hikers and bicyclers..." But here is a quote about that study.

Screen shot from Taylor and Knight study

That's right, since Mountain Bikers cover 2 to 3 times more ground than Hikers, they are disturbing 2 to 3 times more wildlife.  This all seem rather logical.


STC's Gig
Misinformation has always been the Sustainable Trails Coalition's Gig.  Right from the get go, when you visit their website they are lying.

Screen shot from STC's website

Really? Do they have just ONE quote from President Lyndon B Johnson that he never intended to ban bicycles in Wilderness Areas?  NO THEY DON'T.

While the Sustainable Trails Coalition is "Just Making Up Stuff," it's sad to see that IMBA is blatantly giving out the wrong information.

Tracy Ridge, Part 3

With just a few more days left to submit comments, I’m taking another look at the Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Forest Plan Amendment Project Environmental Assessment and making some more comments.  You can find information on how to submit your own comments to the Forest Service at the bottom of this post.

The Overlooks have been over looked

According to the Environmental Assessment:

“In the 1990s, this area was seen as a magnet for day hiking and backpacking.”  

Well, what happened?  

Here’s another sentence from the Assessment:

“The 1995 decision also authorized the creation of vista area³ that would provide recreationalist a view of the reservoir.”   

Well, as you can see, there is a footnote after the words “vista area.”  What does that footnote say?  It says

“Today, the vista areas (as indicated on the maps) do not have views of the reservoir except during  “leaf off.”

Well, that explains why people are not hiking out to the overlooks.  It’s because there are no overlooks.  Or as I call it, the overlooks have been over looked.

 

Overlooks such as this one on the North Country Trail in Wisconsin need to be maintained
every 2 to 3 years

Overlooks, like anything else needs to be maintained, especially overlooks in the woods that are not rocky outcroppings. The Forest Service needs to send someone down the hill with a chainsaw to clear the overlooks.  This needs to be done every two to 3 years.  Of course, if Tracy Ridge does become a Wilderness, that work will have to be done by people with cross cut saws.  So, if there are no overlooks on trails that are supposed to have overlooks, no wonder the trails are not being use that much.

It is not Clear

Under "Alternative 2 Proposed Action" it reads. 

“Although brought up by commenters, it is not clear how shared use trails in the Tracy Ridge area would disqualify the area for wilderness designation.”   

The key part of that sentence is the part where it says “it is not clear.”  Sounds like the Forest Service doesn’t know for sure.  They go on to mention to say

“There is no evidence that bike use of the area would degrade the trails at all and certainly to the point in which wilderness designation would be improbable.” 

Well, I have BIG NEWS for the Forest Service.  The degrading of the trails is not the issue when it comes to the mountain bikes in the Wilderness.  The issue is that mountain bikers are now the most vocal opponents of any Wilderness Designation. It’s hard enough to get any Wilderness Area passed by Congress without having vocal opponents.  Just google “mountain biking, wilderness” and you will find dozens of articles on this subject.

Just Google "mountain bikes, Wilderness" and you will find several articles from the past year.

Small Area
Also, we are talking about a very small section of land that mountain bikers are being excluded from.  Tracy Ridge is 9705 acres. In the lower 48 States, Wilderness Areas are only are around 2.7% of the land area.  Currently, the State of Pennsylvania has 9005 acres of Federally Designated Wilderness.  That 9005 acres represents .03% of the land area of the State of Pennsylvania.  That’s right, 3 hundredths of 1 percent of Pennsylvania is Wilderness.   

 

Pennsylvania ranks low on the list of percentage of land used as Wilderness Areas

Even if all the Wilderness Areas that the Friends of the Allegheny Wilderness are proposing are approved by Congress, that still is .2% of the land area of Pennsylvania.  That’s right, it’s only about 1/5th of 1 percent of the land area.

Schutte Study

Under  "Issue 2- How would the shared use proposal affect the Forest’s ability to provide various trail/recreations" 

It says:
“A study of mountain bikers in Boulder, CO, for example, found that 81% of the riders preferred single track trails for riding (Schutte, 2003)” 

Under “Alternative 2” in that same section, it says 

”Also, much of Jakes Rocks Trails will be in close proximity to the road system – the current 10 miles, for example, are all within ¾ mile of a road.  The Tracy Ridge trails, by contrast, provide a much more remote “backcounty” feel.”

Well, did the Forest Service even read the rest of the study they cited by Stacey Schutte?  Here are a few findings from that study which can be found here: http://www.bouldercounty.org/os/culture/posresearch/2003schulte.pdf

 

The Study by Stacey Shulte

The Forest Service seems to think that mountain bikers are seeking a remote “backcountry” feel, but in the Schutte Study “solitude” is very low on the scale of being important as a reason for biking.  In fact, 1% of the mountain bikers responding state that Solitude is the main reason they pick a mountain biking trail to ride on.  Nature/Scenery does rank high on the list, but with no vistas at Tracy Ridge, that is also not much of a factor to draw mountain bikers.

From the Schutte Study

Also in the Schutte Study it says that only 8% of mountain bikers enjoy riding on “gentle slopes.”  Since the Forest Service itself has described the trails at Tracy Ridge as having “gentle grades,” well, that means that 92% of mountain bikers will not be attracted to Tracy Ridge

From the Schutte Study

Also, according to that study “Almost 90% of the respondents rate themselves as an intermediate rider or above.”  So, the beginner trails with gentle grades will not be attracting almost 90% of mountain bikers.

From the Schutte Study

And even mountain bikers on their own mountain biking forums don't think that having only 12 miles of trails open to mountain biking will make Tracy Ridge a mountain biking destination

Gigantic, regular poster on MTBR.com's forums

 Trailhead Counters.

According to the Environmental Assessment, a counter was installed at the Morrison Trailhead in the summer of 2016.  It received 1000-1250 visitors a month, this is two times greater than the than the numbers at Tracy Ridge.  Also, according to the Assessment, an estimated 1500 users utilized the Jakes Rock Trailhead in October of 2016 while only 400 users were at the Tracy Ridge Trailhead. 

Well, there’s a big reason for the difference.  According to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, the traffic count on Hwy 59 is 1400 cars per day.  Highway 59 is the highway where both the Morrison Trail and Jake’s Rock are located. The traffic count for Hwy 321, the Highway that Tracy Ridge is on, is only 100 cars per day. Again, these are Pennsylvania DOT statistics.

 

Screen Shot from the Pennsylvania DOT's Website showing cars per day.

In other words, the Morrison Trail and the Trails at Jakes Rock are convenient to 1300 more cars a day than Tracy Ridge.  There are 1300 more cars available to stop by and check out those trails, than at Tracy Ridge.  There are 1300 more cars that stopping by Jakes Rock and doing a short ride is not going out of the way.  Meanwhile, going to Tracy Ridge is going out of the way for everyone except the 100 cars a day.

The National Forest System Stewardship Act

On November 28, 2016, President Obama signed the National Forest System Stewardship Act into law.  This Act gives the Forest Service more resources to maintain trails.  That’s just what Tracy Ridge needs.  The Act authorized the use of off-season Forest Service firefighters to maintain trails.  It also gives incentives to volunteers to help maintain trails, including some liability and insurance issues. The Bill is patterned after a 2010 Act that helps National Wildlife Refuges obtain volunteers.  The Forest Service didn’t have a very good overall strategy for obtaining volunteers.  This Act addresses that problem.

A KGWN article about the new National Forest System Stewardship Act

The Allegheny National Forest needs to embrace this new law immediately and use it to get new volunteers.  The Forest Service need more volunteers because of Tracy Ridge and because of all the new miles of mountain biking trails being built at Jake’s Rock.  In a few more years there could be 45 miles of mountain biking specific trails at Jake’s Rock.  They will need all the volunteers they can get.

Jakes Rock

And speaking of the Trails at Jake’s Rock, exactly how do they feel about the mountain biking proposal at Tracy Ridge?  You would think they would be excited for some more mountain biking opportunities in the Allegheny Forest area.  Well, the Trails at Jake’s Rock hasn’t even mentioned Tracy Ridge on their Facebook Page since the recent comment period began.  There are no posts encouraging people to write in comments in favor of mountain biking at Tracy Ridge. 

The Facebook Page for Jakes Rock touts the Allegheny River as the "River of the Year"

They are not coming out against mountain biking at Tracy Ridge, perhaps because they don't want to strain their relationship with the Forest Service, but they don’t appear to be overly enthusiastic for it, either.

There's just a few more days left to comment on the Tracy Ridge Project
For instruction on how to comment on the project, go here: http://a123.g.akamai.net/7/123/11558/abc123/forestservic.download.akamai.com/11558/www/nepa/104642_FSPLT3_3806246.pdf

To read the "Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Forest Plan Ammendment Project Environmental Assessment" go here: http://a123.g.akamai.net/7/123/11558/abc123/forestservic.download.akamai.com/11558/www/nepa/104642_FSPLT3_3910848.pdf

You can discuss this blog at the Preserving the PCT facebook page located here: https://www.facebook.com/preservingthepct/